Guide: PostgreSQL Secuirty

Amazon Redshift vs. Postgres: Key Differences and Uses

Data-driven organizations collect and store large quantities of data. An essential component for data-driven organizations is to use a data warehouse to store all of this data. Two popular data warehouses are Amazon Redshift and Postgres. 

These warehouses provide advanced analytical capabilities, empowering data analysts to explore and derive valuable insights from complex data. They also ensure data security and governance, facilitating compliance with regulations. Additionally, data warehouses enable data integration and consolidation, providing a unified view of the business. Overall, they are critical for organizations to leverage their data effectively, make informed decisions, and drive business growth.

Selecting the data warehouse most suited to a company’s requirements can be difficult. In this article, we compare Redshift and Postgres warehouse options:

What is a Data Warehouse?

Data warehouses are computer solutions that collect, save, and analyze information from various data sources. Its goal is to make the data more accessible to business intelligence software so that other systems can search it as a unified, cohesive unit.

 

A data warehouse’s principal function is to make it possible for businesses to view and examine all of the information in their possession. The goal of making this data accessible is to develop precise dashboards and reports with high forecast accuracy.

 

Collected from a range of data sources located throughout a company, data warehouses act as a repository where all data can be stored. The content gets imported into the data warehouse after being taken from various systems, processed into the optimal format, and finally stored. Analyses and reports generated from this central repository of information can then be utilized by the one accessing it.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift was the very first cloud data warehouse and is still prominent today. 

 

Redshift is a controlled column-stored data repository in the cloud that is provided as a service by Amazon. As a controlled column-stored data repository, every column receives an assigned file to serve as its representation. Reading the full table to finish any analytical queries is unnecessary if one is merely interested in retrieving data from a single column or a small number of columns in the table. Redshift possesses the capability to go to table partitioning and retrieve information from the rows that are appropriate to those columns.

 

When businesses have to insert updates due to growing data demands, it is viewed as a solution and replacement to the traditional method of warehousing that is done on-premise. This categorization is because Redshift was developed specifically for complicated queries and can stretch across numerous rows.

 

Amazon Redshift is most well-known for its lightning-fast performance, even though it is designed to manage massive amounts of data. Redshift is among the top alternatives for services that execute a substantial quantity of on-demand searches because it provides rapid query speeds on large amounts of data.

 

Although Redshift is based on Postgresql, it does not include many of the functions available in the regular querying layer of Postgres. Redshift compensates for the capabilities it lacks with its versatility and its capacity to analyze massive volumes of data.

 

Learn more about Satori and Redshift

Advantages of Amazon Redshift

The following are the primary benefits of using Redshift:

 

  • Provides general and query performances that are among the fastest available.
  • Easily accessible and well-known for its user-friendliness
  • Scalability
  • Cost-effective performance

Postgres

Postgres is a row-store repository that operates on an open-source platform. As a row-store repository, table partitioning comprises entities referred to as rows. Additionally, Postgres provides all of the functionality one might anticipate finding in a database table, such as user-defined categories, cardinality, foreign keys, etc.

 

When utilizing Postgres, it is simple to search a large number of rows no matter how many columns are in the table.

 

When you have a large table and wish to analyze the data, Postgres can be an extremely effective tool. Suppose you would like to examine the entirety of the data from a high-level perspective. In that case, Postgres makes it possible to determine whether or not there are any recognizable trends. When contrasting Redshift with Postgres, this is one of the areas where inexperienced Redshift analysts may have difficulty.


Learn more about Satori and Postgres

Postgres vs. Redshift

Redshift and Postgresql contain several noticeable distinctions.

Performance

The primary architectural distinction between Redshift and Postgres is that the former is a column-oriented OLAP system, while the latter is an OLTP system. In contrast to columns in Redshift, rows serve as the core data element in Postgres. Such a column-oriented system can take up less disk space than a conventional database system.

 

Rather than being a single-node database resembling Postgres, Redshift operates as a cluster. Redshift lets users configure nodes based on efficiency and cost. Redshift excels at sophisticated, analytical operations with a wide range. Postgres is better for searches with limited data spans.

Scaling

The goal of Redshift’s design is effortless scaling. Deploying nodes, updating node settings, or a mix of the two, is how this gets accomplished. Moreover, Redshift’s architecture is based on massively parallel processing, a feature that makes it scale effectively. In comparison, scalability is not a strength of Postgres because it is a centralized repository.

Pricing

Postgres is free. However, it requires hardware. If one desires a Postgres-based database system competing with Redshift, server expenses may be higher.

Conclusion

The right solution will depend on your organizational data needs. There are positive aspects to both data warehouses, the final selection will depend on the main requirements. Whichever option you choose, Satori’s Data Security Platform can provide comprehensive automated and secure access to data.

 

To learn more:

 

Last updated on

July 4, 2023

The information provided in this article and elsewhere on this website is meant purely for educational discussion and contains only general information about legal, commercial and other matters. It is not legal advice and should not be treated as such. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. The information in this article is provided ‚Äúas is‚ÄĚ without any representations or warranties, express or implied. We make no representations or warranties in relation to the information in this article and all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this article are hereby expressly disclaimed. You must not rely on the information in this article as an alternative to legal advice from your attorney or other professional legal services provider. If you have any specific questions about any legal matter you should consult your attorney or other professional legal services provider. This article may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites.